The Education-Industrial Complex
August 19, 2013
On August 7th, the New York State Department of Education
released the first round of student scores using the Common Core Standards based
tests in English and math. Statewide, the passing rate for these tests was
abominable with just a 31% passing rate. That represents a drop of nearly 25%
since last year. This overall drop in passing rates has led to a mixture of
reactions. The most dominant theme coming from the politicians and corporate leaders
promoted the test was an expectation for failure. How can it ever be beneficial
to create a system with expectations of failure? The problem lies in the way
these tests have been developed- without any empirical data to support the
tests- and the nature of the motivations behind such testing.
Failure and disappointment can oftentimes be beneficial. In
fact, I would say they are necessary for proper growth and development. I would
even go so far as to say that our society has mistreated failure by insulating
our children from many negative impacts. However, I will say that constant
failure, despite proper and studious preparation, can have devastating impacts
on students, teachers and communities alike. Our children are guinea pigs in a
great educational experiment with high stakes for them and their teachers. But
once again, why would we expose our students to such a failure and the stress
that accompanies it?
In 1961, President Dwight D. Eisenhower warned of a growing
military-industrial complex. Over the
past 50 years, we have seen his warning of a political and industrial behemoth come
to fruition. Today, we face a growing educational-industrial complex with
similar warnings coming from both ends of the political spectrum. For some,
public education is the final frontier; the last stronghold of public control
that is ripe for privatization and profiteering.
Here’s how such a system is meant to work:
STEP ONE- Make false claims about the “failing American educational
system”. Many of the proponents of the Common Core Standards are corporate
leaders who claim American education is in crisis when compared to
international competition. However, when viewed through value-added measures
for poverty and ethnicity, American students actually end up ranked among the
top tier of global students. In addition, in the most recent TIMMS tests for
math and science (2011) American students continued to show growth in these
areas. In the case of math, students have shown continuous and progressive
growth since the test was first introduced in 1995. We don’t have an education
crisis per se; we have a poverty crisis.
STEP TWO- Create a test that proves you're right. In this
case, politicians and corporate leaders heralded a new curriculum tied to
college and career readiness. What business leaders want most, are workers with
the ability to collaborate, use of oral and written communication skills and
critical thinking skills. Much of the Core curriculum does just that. However, the tests that were administered
don’t assess these skills. These multiple choice tests are inappropriate when
compared to the goals of the curriculum.
STEP THREE- Use the disastrous test scores to claim there is
a need for further reform. As the state tests
result in high failure rates, many proponents of privatization will inevitably
cry for more private access to educate our children. Forget that such
experiments have shown little result of improved academic performance when
compared to public school performance. In this case, it’s about the money.
There is big money to be made in testing, curriculum materials and privatization.
Corporations such as Pearson, McGraw, Apple, The College Board, and many others
stand to make billions of dollars through materials and development.
STEP FOUR- Kill the unions. Quite simply put, teachers
unions are powerful. They collect massive amounts of money from tens of
thousands of members who are politically active and highly motivated. These
unions represent the last vestige of resistance to these privatization overhauls
while maintaining their professional ranks, promised benefits and middle class
wages. This group represents “lost” capital to the government and corporate
powers and they don’t like it. Oddly enough, the two major teachers unions have
partnered in this endeavor thanks to large endowments for collaboration from
the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
STEP FIVE- Create a permanent working class. In the end, the
worst thing that may come out of this is the actual dumbing-down of American
students. Due to the weight of the test results toward teacher evaluation and
school success, teachers are forced to focus their time and efforts into
assessment achievement rather than the college and career readiness skills the
Core curriculum calls for. Spending 4-6
weeks of the academic year preparing for a test is unacceptable. Who benefits
from an uneducated populace; one that can’t actually think critically about the
political, social and economic world that affects them?
Unfortunately, this is the culture we have allowed to thrive.
As we move forward, there will certainly be continuing discussion about where
we go from here. As an educator, I welcome rigorous curriculum and a goal of
high achievement for all our students. College and true career readiness (including
vocational training) should always be a goal for our public education system.
Yet, it is also important that we achieve these goals responsibly and with the
best interests of our children at heart. Unfortunately, the Common Core State
Standards, and in particular, the tests being developed through consortiums
like PARCC and SMARTER Balanced simply do not help us achieve these goals. Our
children, our families and our communities deserve better.
Kill the Unions..."they" are doing a good job at killing the unions. Can't wait to see the results. I think there are a lot of people who see that as a giant money saving mechanism and I think they are going to be very wrong.
ReplyDelete